FOR HELP AND ADVICE – SHAW WARD SURGERIES

advice-signpost2

Councillors Rod Blyth, Mark Alcock and Howard Sykes.

Also Parish Councillors Aspinall, Farrell, Duffy, Hall, Stephens, Dodd, Robinson, Murphy and Wood will also attend.

7.30pm – 8.30pm, Lifelong Learning Centre, High Street, Shaw, OL2 8TB.

Thursday: October: 2, 9, 16

NO APPOINTMENT REQUIRED

Questions from Howard Sykes Lib Dem Leader and Leader of the Opposition to the Council Leader – Oldham Council 10 September 2014

Question 1 – Rotherham and child protection

My first question this evening concerns the tragic details revealed in a recent Independent Report commissioned by Rotherham Council about the failure of Children’s Services and other agencies in the Local Authority area to address child sexual exploitation over many years.

Professor Alexis Jay’s Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham covering the period 1997 to 2013 found there was a lack of scrutiny and challenge; a chronic failure of senior councillors, staff members and police officers to engage with the problem; and an inability of both councillors and the Local Safeguarding Board to monitor and challenge practices within the Council.

Whilst the Report focusses only on the failures of the agencies in Rotherham, previous cases show that these problems are not exclusive to one area and that every Local Authority needs to learn lessons from this report to ensure that its own services conform to best practice.

The Leader will recall that, immediately following the publication of Professor Jay’s Report, I wrote to both the Chief Executive and himself seeking reassurance that Oldham Council will be conducting its own review in light of the findings. I am pleased that the prompt response contained such an assurance.

This is not an issue from which to make political capital so I want now to state for the record that the Liberal Democrat Group will be fully supportive of such a Review.

But for the information of all Councillors in this Chamber, and concerned citizens who are listening or watching these proceedings tonight, I would like to ask the Leader when and how the Council will be conducting this Review, and when we might expect to receive the findings?

Question 2 – Community Health Champions

My second question concerns the health of our employees.

As a Local Authority and employer, we have statutory duties to promote public health and the health and safety of our employees.

This should extend to providing them with advice and support to adopt healthy lifestyle choices and to address behaviour that may damage their health.

I make here particular reference to smoking, an issue of great concern to Councillors of all Parties.

Smoking is the harbinger of death and chronic illness to many, but for a Local Authority it also leads to greater employee absenteeism and a loss of productivity, meaning serious financial costs for this Council.

It is therefore particularly in our self-interest to reduce the prevalence of smoking amongst its workforce.

The NHS Health Improvement Team is now recruiting Community Health Champions in workplaces to promote healthy lifestyle choices to co-workers and to address behaviour that can lead to ill-health, such as smoking.

The Council has established the Employee Supported Volunteering Scheme and I am convinced that this represents an excellent mechanism to recruit employees from all sections of this Council to train as Community Health Champions.

I believe the Council should establish a programme of work for these volunteers with measurable targets monitored by the team of the Director of Public Health covering initially the period to National No Tobacco Day 31st May 2015.

Will the Leader agree to take forward this proposal?

Question 3 – Honouring The Great War Heroes

My third question concerns our recognition of three local men who in the First World War won Britain’s highest military award, The Victoria Cross.

I am sure the Leader will recall the correspondence that he received last year from my colleague, the Deputy Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group, Cllr John McCann, requesting that local streets be named after local heroes.

Local Communities Secretary Eric Pickles has commissioned commemorative paving stones to be laid as a mark of honour and remembrance in the locality of every Great War VC winner.

In announcing the initiative, Mr Pickles said: “It’s our duty to remember the British and Commonwealth troops who lost their lives fighting in the Great War and we are determined to make sure their bravery for King and Country is not forgotten.”

Sentiments that I am sure the Leader will endorse.

Three paving stones will be received for local heroes John Hogan, of Royton; Walter Mills, of Oldham; and Thomas Steele, of Springhead.
Lest we forget their heroic deeds, please allow me to give a brief summary.

Sergeant John Hogan, of the 2nd Battalion Manchester Regiment, received his VC from King George V in 1915. He was awarded the VC for recapturing a trench near Festubert in October, 1914.

Private Walter Mills was awarded the VC posthumously after he was caught in a gas attack on the Western Front in December 1917. Despite being gassed, a truly horrible fate, he remained at his post alone, throwing grenades until the enemy retreated.

Private Thomas Steele served with the 1st Battalion, Seaforth Highlanders in Mesopotamia (now Iraq). He was awarded his VC for an action in January, 1917, when he helped a comrade carry a machine gun into position under heavy fire.

Can I ask the Leader if he and Councillor Ball will agree to work with me, Cllr McCann and ward members to identify new developments where these gallant men might have local streets named after them?

Howard Sykes
10 September 2014

Shaw Baths campaign stepped up by Lib Dems

001456_Swimming-Pool
Liberal Democrats in Shaw and Crompton have handed in a 960 name petition to Oldham Council protesting against the decision to close the hundred year old baths.

The baths closed in May following a failure of the boiler and shortly after the local elections, the Labour administration in Oldham announced that the closure would be permanent.

The petition, gathered online and through street stalls from residents of Shaw and Crompton, calls on the council to re-open the pool immediately.

Lib Dem parliamentary spokesman for Oldham East and Saddleworth and Shaw resident Richard Marbrow said, “Shaw has had a swimming pool for well over a hundred years and Oldham Labour want to throw that history and a much loved community facility away.”

Crompton councillor Dave Murphy said, “Labour councillors made commitments to keep the pool open until a new pool at Royton was opened. They have completely broken that promise and we will hold their feet to the fire until they reverse course.”

The Lib Dem controlled district executive for Shaw and Crompton has offered money from district funds to Oldham council to re-open the pool but has received no response.

Richard Marbrow added, “We are now being told that the pool is too damaged to re-open, because the Labour administration did not take immediate action when the boiler broke down. If that is the case the Liberal Democrats will campaign for a new pool to be built.”

“Shaw and Crompton deserves decent leisure facilities and I will work alongside the borough and parish councillors for the area to get a pool re-opened in our town.”

http://www.richardmarbrow.org.uk/re_open_crompton_pool

UPDATE ROAD CLOSURE

pedestrians_safe-crossing-places_pixAs you will no doubt be aware, work is ongoing at the Crompton Way / Milnrow Road / Linney Lane / Salts Street junction to install traffic signals / pedestrian crossing facilities.

As part of this work, it will be necessary to close Milnrow Road at its junction with Crompton Way on Sunday 21 September in order to take out the existing traffic island / pedestrian refuge and construct a new one.

Well Hello there, do you want to make YOUR Big Bill into a Little Bill…?

ChasingTail_BillWell Hello there, do you want to make YOUR Big Bill into a Little Bill…?

Little Bill is working with your Local Council and the Greater Manchester Energy Advice service to help make your home more energy efficient. We have a package of help available ranging from solar panels, new boilers and financial support for insulation (including solid wall insulation).

You may live in a Green Deal Communities area where you can also apply for up to £7,000 towards home improvements such as new windows and doors, central heating systems, solar panels and insulation.

Visit our website to see if you fall within these areas – Funds are limited, so hurry before it runs out!

Visit www.gmenergyadvice.co.uk to find out more or call 0800 009 3363 or 0161 234 5460 (Mon-Fri 9am-5pm).

Fancy being a Little Bill Show Home…?
We are looking for households in our Green Deal Communities areas to become a show home and demonstrate innovative energy-saving improvements and share their experiences. In return, we will be offering selected households up to £12,000 towards the costs of these improvements.

30 households across Greater Manchester will be selected, according to criteria including location, house type and the range of energy improvements that could be installed. This offer is only available to households in Little Bill Communities areas – check the website to see if you qualify.

Residents on low incomes – For residents who are on specific eligible benefits we also have access to grants to assist with boiler replacement and free insulation.

Terms and conditions apply, see our website for further information.
Best wishes,
Little Bill

Follow me on Twitter @asklittlebill

NB: GMEA is the new name for Greater Manchester Energy Advice Services which helped thousands of households benefit from warmer homes thanks to the Get Me Toasty campaign which ran in partnership with local councils from 2011 to 2013.

Rochdale Road/Fraser Street/Chamber Road Junction

traffic-lights-sign
The Council has confirmed that until such time as the footway frontages on both Rochdale Road and Fraser Street are able to be opened fully to the public, the temporary footways will remain in place and therefore the temporary traffic lights must also remain.

Highways have had many complaints regarding the timings at these signals, however, drivers may not appreciate that they are four way signals with their own green phase on each of the four legs. This means that it will take between two and two and a half minutes between green phases on each leg, so that is six to seven minutes if your lights have just changed to red.

The signals have failed a couple of times which is unfortunate but cannot be avoided; things do malfunction from time to time.

Whenever a malfunction occurs please contact the signal company (Amberon) straight away. Phone: 07875 815 542.

Regarding the works at the shop loss adjustors have now completed their operation and the repair works are currently out to tender. Hopefully work will start in a couple of weeks.

I can assure people the owner of the business wishes these works completed as soon as possible so he can start trading again.

Despite efforts to do so I have been unable to obtain a completion date at this time, if I do I will update people.

Many thanks for your patience but for the safety of both pedestrians and drivers it is essential these signals are in place and working until these works are completed.

Warm Welcome for Lib Dem Manifesto Pledge to Triple Early Years Funding

Warm Welcome for Lib Dem Manifesto Pledge to Triple Early Years Funding

The Leader of the Opposition and of the Liberal Democrat Group, Councillor Howard Sykes MBE, has warmly welcomed the recent announcement by the Liberal Democrats that they will more than triple investment in the early years pupil premium from £300 to £1000 per child if they form part of the next Government.

The early years pupil premium was announced in March 2014 and is currently worth £300 for every disadvantaged child. Last week Lib Dem Schools Minister David Laws announced that as part of the party’s manifesto this would be increased to £1000.

On hearing the news, Cllr Sykes said:

“By committing this extra money to help the youngest disadvantaged children in society, the Liberal Democrats will ensure that every child gets the best possible start in life, is ready to learn when they start school and so have an opportunity to get on.

As children in early years are only in part time education this represents an equivalent investment higher than the primary school pupil premium, demonstrating the huge importance that Liberal Democrats place on early years education.

This will benefit over 170,000 disadvantaged children from 2015-16”.

Notes

• Increases to the Early Years Pupil Premium will follow the same pattern as the schools Pupil Premium – with the value gradually increasing over the lifetime of the parliament until it reaches £1000 per child. Because children in early years are only in part time education this is an equivalent rate higher than the primary school pupil premium.

• It will pay early years providers an additional amount per year for each eligible child that takes up the full 570 hour entitlement with them.

• The eligible groups will be children from low income families (defined as meeting the criteria for free school meals); children that have been looked after by the local authority for at least one day; have been adopted from care; have left care through special guardianship; and children subject to a child arrangement order setting out with whom the child is to live (formerly known as residence orders).

• As with the schools pupil premium, the Liberal Democrats would not impose restrictions on how providers spend the Early Years Pupil Premium. However, Ofsted will hold providers to account for how they’ve used the money to support their disadvantaged children through the regular inspection process.

• It is estimated that over 170,000 children could benefit from the EYPP in 2015-16 and future years.

• More information on the early years pupil premium is available here: https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/early-years-pupil-premium-and-funding-for-2-year-olds
http://www.libdems.org.uk

Lib Dems welcome findings of recent Sanctions Review

Lib Dems welcome findings of recent Sanctions Review

The Leader of the Opposition and of the Liberal Democrat Group on Oldham Council, Cllr Howard Sykes MBE, has welcomed the recent findings of the independent review carried out by Matthew Oakley, a member of the Social Security Advisory Committee, on behalf of the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, Ian Duncan Smith MP.

The review was published on 22nd July; just days after Cllr Sykes had written to the Minister with his concerns about the operation of the benefits sanction regime and delays in the publication of the report.

Cllr Sykes said: “Whilst I cannot solely claim the credit for the timing of the publication of the report I am sure that my recent letter, along with many others, must have made the Minister realise that benefit claimants and policymakers were anxious to see this report sooner rather than later. The review included a public consultation that ended in January and, as I made plain in my correspondence with the Minister, the delay was I felt long enough.”

The review makes a number of core recommendations; all of which have been accepted by Minister of Employment, Esther McVey, MP, for the Government.

These recommendations included:

• Improving the letters sent to claimants
• Broader communication improvements
• Improving claimants’ understanding of what they are required to do
• Improving understanding of the sanctions process

They are intended to:

• Improve claimants’ understanding of what is expected of them in looking for work and how a sanction may be applied if they should fail to do so
• Raise the awareness of claimants of their rights to seek a review of the decision and to make an appeal
• Raise the awareness amongst claimants of the availability of hardship funds

Cllr Sykes welcomed the findings:

“In my letter to the Secretary of State, I called on him to strike the right balance between placing robust expectations on claimants to find work and giving them the right help and support to do so. Often claimants are not told what is expected of them and so may not be offered the chance or the right support to meet the requirements before being subjected to a sanction.

“As a sanction can result in benefits being withdrawn from a claimant for between four weeks and – in the most extreme instances – three years, I sought to impress upon the Secretary of State that claimants should be given the information and support they need to take responsibility and make the right choices, as well as being made aware of their right to seek a review of the decision to impose a sanction or to appeal against that decision or to make a claim for a hardship payment.

“I am pleased to say that my recommendations to the Secretary of State have been mirrored in the findings of this report.

“I now hope that claimants will be better informed as a result of the report to be able to comply with the requirements of seeking work, and so not jeopardise their entitlement to benefit, and also be more empowered to challenge effectively decisions made against them when they have good reason to do so”.

Cllr Sykes added:

“The cross-party Parliamentary Work and Pensions Select Committee said that whilst sanctions can be a ‘useful tool for encouraging engagement with employment support’, sanctions should only be used as a ‘last resort’. I hope that these changes will lead to claimants being offered a chance to make the necessary behaviour changes first (a warning if you will) before they lose their income”.

The review and the Government’s response can be found at:

Jobseeker’s Allowance sanctions: independent review: call for evidence – Consultations – GOV.UK