Crompton Moor, Oldham Countryside Volunteer Ranger Group Event, being held on Sunday 28th February 2016

2537082308_8a8b80b008

With that time of the month again fast approaching, weather permitting we have a repair/renew task this Sunday, involving possibly a strainer but more than likely intermediate supports and possibly some fencing if it is available, but the good news is that as long as it does not snow we should have the OMBC Landie available to us.

If the forecast remains as it is today i.e. cold, please ensure you have the appropriate warm clothing, sturdy footwear, and a packed lunch if you are up for the day but would again suggest a thoroughly hot flask of your favourite drink whatever the length of your stay.

Meantime, if you have any issues that you may wish to discuss prior to Sunday, please do not hesitate to mail or phone me on 07961107860.  Look forward to seeing you in the Compton Moor Car Park ~ 10.30am.

Kindest Regards, Edward John Fulton, Countryside Volunteer Ranger

(M) 07961 107860  (F)  01706 661813  (E)  edward@edwardjohnfulton.uk

Lib Dems call for investment in better roads/pavements, cleaner streets and more cash for local districts to spend

Void-period-of-Council-tax-to-landlord-how-I-got-round-it

The Lib Dem Group on Oldham Council will propose that in this year’s budget and council tax setting meeting (Wed 24 Feb) more money is invested on highway and environmental improvements to make the Borough’s streets safer and cleaner, and that more cash is given to each of the districts so that local people have more say on where money is spent on local priorities.

Councillors Sykes will formally move the Lib Dem proposals and Shadow Cabinet Member for Finance and Deputy Leader of the Lib Dem Group, Councillor John McCann will second the fully costed and scrutinised proposal.

Lib Dem Group Leader, Councillor Howard Sykes MBE, said:

“Labour is proposing that Council Tax bills rise by 2% to pay for improvements to adult social care and a further 1.7% for other services.”

“We support the rise as funding cuts to local government have now become so great that some of our vital services are in real danger of collapse, but we want to see more money spent wisely on some of the Council services that our rate payers most value.”

“Every Councillor has received complaints from the public about the state of our roads, about dirty streets and about instances of fly tipping.  Ratepayers expect their money to be spent on providing quality services in the neighbourhoods in which they live – the Liberal Democrats want to see more funding spent on bringing our roads up to scratch, on supporting a ‘war on waste’ and on devolving more of our budget to local leaders in each of our borough’s districts so that more local services can be delivered in response to local needs.”

The Liberal Democrats are calling for the 1.7% Council Tax rise to be used to:

  • Invest £5 million on improving the Borough’s highways.
  • Employ two more teams and an extra vehicle on gully-cleaning across the Borough.
  • Restore the free Bulky Bob bulk waste collection service to the public.
  • Devolve cash to districts and local councillors so they will have £1 million to spend; a total of £50,000 for each of the 20 wards, in addition to £15K councillors have to spend in their wards.

“A 1.7% Council Tax increase will allow the Council to borrow an extra £5 million to invest in our borough’s roads.  Imagine the impact that such an investment will make – the money can be employed wisely on improving roads where there is greatest public demand and drivers and their passengers will enjoy safer, smoother roads and improvements in travel times and road safety.”

The Shadow Cabinet Member for Finance and Deputy Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group, Councillor John McCann, said:

“The Liberal Democrats would make money available to employ two more cleaning teams and an extra vehicle to jet out gullies that have been filled with soil and other debris. Such an investment would be a victory for common sense as jetting means that clogged gullies do not have to be dug out at huge expense. This also reduces the risk of homes being flooded and there will be less water and ice on the roads, and in the long-term, a reduction in the damage caused by frozen water to road surfaces.”

“The Liberal Democrats also want to use some of the extra money raised through a Council Tax rise to restore the free Bulky Bobs service. From contact with my own constituents, I know that people were angry when a £15 charge was brought in by the Labour Council and the imposition of a charge has contributed to a rise in fly-tipping. Tackling fly-tipping costs the Council and the ratepayers a small fortune so, surely then it is common sense to bring back a free service for everyone at a fraction of the cost.”

The Liberal Democrats want also to keep the team of enforcement officers up to full strength.

Councillor McCann: “We need to continue to employ the same number of officers to carry out enforcement action to ensure that fly-tippers know that in our borough this activity will not be tolerated and that offenders will always be prosecuted.”

“I would also like to speak out particularly in support of the proposal to devolve £1 million of public money down to our districts.  Despite Labour’s rhetoric, the Liberal Democrats are in fact the party of devolution, but in this instance we want to devolve £1 million down from Oldham Council to local people in each of the districts,” stated Councillor Sykes.

“This would provide the three Councillors in every ward with a £50,000 budget to spend collectively to meet the needs of local people.”

“In Shaw and Crompton, for example, we would use some of this money to commission more services for our young people to make up for the closure of our local Youth Centre by the Labour Council, but it is up to the local councillors of every district to decide what is important to the people they serve.”

“The Liberal Democrats stand ready to accept the challenge of spending this money wisely to meet the needs of people in their local community – do Labour, the Tories, the Independents and UKIP?”

Link to the Lib Dems Alternative Budget Proposals starting on page 493: http://committees.oldham.gov.uk/documents/g5890/Public%20reports%20pack%2024th-Feb-2016%2018.00%20Council.pdf?T=10

Councillor demands missing Royal Mail Post Box is replaced

Missing post box Milnrow Rd Dunwood Park Courts Jan 16 web

Response re missing post box.

Good it will be replaced the key question is when which I am still chasing them hard on.

Dear Cllr Sykes

Royal Mail postbox. Milnrow Road, Shaw. Oldham

Thank you for your letter dated 27 January, sent to Mike Newnham.

I am sorry to team of the inconvenience and distress your constituents are experiencing as a result of the removal of the Post box from Milnrow Road.

In terms of the removal of the postbox. I am advised by the local Collections and Planning Manager that it was removed as a direct consequence of an attempt to steal it. During a planned visit to empty the postbox, the Collections Officer noticed the base had been dug out. As a direct consequence, the Collections Officer took the decision to remove the postbox and place it in storage.

As such, I must stress that the removal was not planned and we are currently in the early planning stages of installing a suitable replacement. Taking into account what has happened. As you might imagine with an installation of this type, there are several stages we need to go through before the box can be set up. However, we will do all we can to ensure the process is completed as quickly as possible.

Once again thank you for taking the time to write to us.

Steve Buckley – Chairman & Chief Executive Office

————————————————————————————————–

Local Lib Dem Shaw Councillor Howard Sykes MBE has written to Royal Mail on behalf of many of his constituents who have contacted him regarding a missing mail box on Milnrow Road Shaw (at the entrance to Dunwood Park Courts).

“Over the years, I and my fellow Shaw councillors have campaigned to keep this Post Box as it has been threatened with removal before,” stated Councillor Sykes.

“On each earlier occasion I am pleased to report that Royal Mail was convinced of our arguments and retained the mail box.  I am therefore at a loss as to why this has been removed without any prior notice or notification.”

Councillor Sykes and his Lib Dem colleagues have unanimously agreed that this particular Post Box is much needed, especially by the elderly population that lives in that locality.

“Whilst I understand that it may not be used as much as other Post Boxes, this is the closest mail box for a considerable distance in the locality needed without suitable public transport options which many residents of this area of my Ward rely on to get around,” he added.

Councillor Sykes understands that some of his constituents have been in contact with Royal Mail regarding this matter and he has been told they have been given various responses, none of which help to resolve the situation.

“I would welcome a dialog and some information about this matter,” said Councillor Sykes.

“In the past I have supported Royal Mail proposals to small re-locations so that the Post Box is still available to local residents and also ‘works’ for Royal Mail.”

“Hopefully you will be in a position to replace the Post Box as soon as possible to alleviate the inconvenience and distress it is causing for my constituents.”

Former Cricketers Pub, Milnrow Road, Shaw

1418318255

Reply to the letter we sent below has now been received:

9 February 2016

Re: Cricketers Arms Milnrow Road Shaw Oldham, Lancashire

Thank you for your enquiry in relation to the above property.

I can advise that we are still marketing the Cricketers Arms and hope to agree a sale at some point in the near future.

Should you have any further queries, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Yours sincerely Enterprise Inns plc

David Lea Asset Manager

Copy letter your councillors have had sent about this matter.

27 January 2016

Unique Pub Properties LTD, 3 Monkspath Hall Road, Solihull, B90 4SJ.

Dear Sir or Madam,

Re: Cricketers Arms; Milnrow Rd, Shaw, Oldham, Lancashire OL2 8AP

The above named Public House has been stood vacant and boarded up for some time.

Local residents and Elected Members are now raising concerns and making enquires in relation to future plans for the site.

Therefore I would very much appreciate it if you could advise me of your future plans for this building.

Weight Limit Chamber Road and or Church Road

Weight limitI was asked to find out about this by a number of local residents on Church and Chamber Road – below is the response from the Highways Department.

Can I be clear it does not imply I support (or oppose) this proposal, but as with any residents request I will always do my best to get an answer to the questions they raise.

Dear Cllr Sykes

I refer to your e-mail requesting consideration be given to the introduction of a weight restriction along Chamber Road and or Church Road, Shaw.

I have interrogated a recent traffic survey undertaken along Church Road which has revealed a total of 123 HGV type vehicles used Church Road over a 7 day period (an average of 17 per day).  What is not understood from the survey is how many of these vehicles were using the route as a short cut to and from Rochdale Road and how many were gaining legitimate access to properties.   I would suggest the number recorded is not excessive when considering the number of residential properties in the area which require deliveries from HGV’s.

Environmental weight restrictions have to have an exemption clause for access so that properties in the restricted area can be serviced; because of this exemption, enforcement can be difficult as the Police have to follow vehicles through the restricted area to observe that they have driven straight through without stopping at a property; in some instances they then have to take the vehicle to a weigh bridge to verify its weight.  In view of the enforcement difficulties the Police would need to support the introduction of a scheme for it to be progressed.

Currently, the introduction of a weight restriction also requires the provision of illuminated signs, which are costly.  Each side road approach to the restricted area would have to be signed as well as the junction of Church Road and Chamber Road.  An initial look at the area suggests a minimum of 7 signs would be required for an order introduced along the full length of Church Road and Chamber Road and a minimum of 3 signs would be required for a restriction along Church Road only.  All signs would require an electrical connection.

Indicative costs for the provision and accrual of the signs and processing the traffic order is £30,000 and £14,000 respectively.  Unfortunately, the traffic order budget is limited and cannot fund expensive schemes of this nature; if a scheme was to be progressed a funding bid would have to be put forward for the scheme to be considered as part of the LTP allocation or the District Executive could consider funding the scheme.  Alternatively, the matter could be reconsidered again next year, when the Department for Transport issue the new Traffic Sign Regulations and General Directions.  This document details the illumination requirements for signs and it is understood the new regulations are relaxing the illumination requirements for some signs.  If the weight restriction signing falls within this category a scheme along Church Road / Chamber Road would be less costly.

The effect on displaced traffic movements should also be taken into consideration should a weight restriction be introduced along Church Road / Chamber Road.  If vehicles use this route to access properties within the Netherhouse Estate or the Moor Street / Princess Road area, they will have to use an alternative access which could increase HGV activity on other streets.  If a weight restriction is introduced along Church Road only, then I would suggest the drivers accustomed to using the route as access to and from Rochdale Road would almost certainly use the Netherhouse Estate as an alternative route.

I hope the above is sufficient for you to consider the matter further, but please contact me should you require any additional information.

Regards

Sarah Robinson

Traffic Engineer, Traffic and Network Management | Unity Partnership

Henshaw House, Cheapside, Oldham OL1 1NY

T  0161 770 4377 | F  0161 770 3411

E sarah.robinson@unitypartnership.com | W  www.unitypartnership.com