IMPROVING RAILWAY STATION ACCESSIBILITY

images

The motion for debate at Oldham Council on Wednesday 14 December is about IMPROVING RAILWAY STATION ACCESSIBILITY.

The motion is about the failure of the railway system in general to adapt to the needs of the 21st century especially regarding the less agile elderly, those with young children and those with baggage or disabilities.

Indeed Councillor Sykes points out that ” about half of the railway stations across Greater Manchester still require work to make them fully accessible, in stark contrast to the Metrolink system which is notable for the care taken to cater for all.”

Taking a more ‘local’ look at Oldham’s only railway station: Greenfield

Councillor McCann states that ” whilst the station now has an information system, a staffed booking office (wonderfully helpful staff) and a toilet, there is still no way a disabled person can get to the platform for trains to Huddersfield and beyond or indeed get from Manchester to Greenfield due to the long, steep flight of steps to the bridge used as the travelers crossing.” 

The present station arrangement is down to the age of the station and lack of national rail will and finance to modernise stations to enable full access for all.

So when a multi million pound project is announced to electrify the line with all the major works this entails including bridge rebuild at Greenfield then says Cllr. McCann “one would think that whilst doing major works the chance would be taken to include disabled access in the actual works; a position fully supported by Oldham council who have fought with local groups to facilitate this approach.

It makes sense on financial, efficiency and fairness grounds. But there has not been any indication that common sense has penetrated the depths of the rail planners.” 

Council 14 December 2016 – Notice of Opposition Business – Motion 3 – Improving Railway Station Accessibility

This Council notes:

  • The Government’s stated commitment to encourage people with disabilities to return to paid employment
  • The important role of railways in getting people to and from their places of work
  • That, in contrast to Metrolink, disabled people still face difficulties in accessing some rail services
  • The importance of the £102 million Department for Transport ‘Access for All’ programme in funding adaptations to railway stations to make them more accessible
  • That around half of all of the 96 railway stations across Greater Manchester still require more work to make them accessible, including the only railway station in the borough, Greenfield Station

This Council notes with concern:

  • Proposals within the recent Hendy Report to defer half of the ‘Access for All’ projects until the period 2019-24 meaning unacceptable delays in the adaptations to stations
  • That any delay to the adaptation of a station means that rail services there will not be accessible to all which is contrary to UK equalities legislation

Council resolves to ask the Chief Executive to:

  • Write to the relevant Secretary of State asking him to reject the proposed re-phasing of Access for All projects and to instead, wherever possible, undertake more station adaptations at the current time
  • Write to the Chair of Transport for Greater Manchester Committee and the Lead member on the Greater Manchester Combined Authority for Transport Tony Lloyd urging them to consider how more funding can be made available to bring our region’s railway stations up to the high accessibility standards of Metrolink

Proposed by: Councillor John McCann

Seconded by: Councillor Howard Sykes MBE

Beal Lane traffic

beal-lane-02-12-16-web

I have been contacted and observed myself the recent traffic issues with HGVs on Beal Lane.

I have pursued this matter with Council Officers – see below.

Photo of Beal Lane at 11.30 today.  The vehicles are not moving.  The queue stretched back to Crompton Way. It took 45 minutes to clear. Most vehicles were for Yodel.

This is not the first time in the last few days and people have been told it will be like this for a few weeks a yet.

I understand it is a busy time for Yodel and JD Williams but they cannot log jam a road a road like this on a daily basis, they should hold the wagons elsewhere until they have a clear run into their facility.

Something needs to be done about this and soon.

I have now received a response from Sarah Robinson, Traffic Engineer, shared herewith for your information.

Dear Cllr Sykes

Further to my e-mail to the Police, a police officer has been to visit the Transport Manager at Yodel to discuss the congestion problems being experienced along Beal Lane.  Further to the Police visit Yodel has now confirmed the following:-

Measures have been taken to prevent re occurrence of the problems experienced last week. Inbound goods have been diverted away from the Beal Lane site to a centre in the Midlands. These measures have significantly reduced the amount of traffic coming into Shaw.

Yodel has also adjusted the inbound times on some of the other collections so the spread is throughout the day thus preventing pinch points and the potential for congestion.

The above appears to be working well and doing what was intended.

Should you get any reports that the congestion problems have occurred again please let me know and I will try and resolve the matter either through the Police or with the assistance of Yodel.

Regards

Sarah Robinson

Traffic Engineer, Traffic and Network Management

 Unity Partnership Henshaw House, Cheapside, Oldham OL1 1NY

T  0161 770 4377 | F  0161 770 3411

E sarah.robinson@unitypartnership.com | W  www.unitypartnership.com

Hopefully this should help with the problem.

Shaw and Crompton Green belt under threat – additional meeting 3pm-7pm, 15 Dec 16

imagesFurther to our recent discussions and demands by local Liberal Democrat Councillors an additional meeting about the Greater Manchester Spacial Framework has now been organised.

A drop-in meeting between 3.00pm – 7.00pm on 15th December 2016 at the Shaw Lifelong Learning Centre, High Street, Shaw OL2 8TB.

We have been assured this will be better organised and staffed than the last drop in session and the planners were very clear this was their preferred format rather than a traditional public meeting.  We had asked for both it this was refused.

Hopefully this should provide residents with:

  • One-to-one meetings on the day with Officers able to answer their varied questions.
  • The offer of a follow-up one-to-one meetings of a longer variety if requested / necessary for residents.

I would urge all that can to attend to find out what is proposed for vast tracks of our Green Belt.

Shaw and Crompton Green Belt under threat

imagesGreater Manchester Spatial Framework

Strategic Options consultation

Over the next 20 years there is a need to deliver continued sustainable economic growth, creating more jobs and new homes for the people of Greater Manchester.

The ten local authorities in Greater Manchester are working together on a joint plan called the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework (GMSF) this is being prepared to ensure that new homes and jobs are provided in the right places with the transport (roads, rail, Metrolink) and infrastructure to support the communities and manage growth sustainably.

The draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework sets out:

  • How much housing and employment land is needed up to 2035
  • A number of strategic sites across Greater Manchester to assist in meeting these requirements
  • The importance of infrastructure such as, health, education, transport, green spaces and utilities to support neighbourhoods and employment
  • Ways to protect and improve the natural environment.

Public consultation on the draft version of the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework runs from 31 October to 23 December 2016.  During this time, we would welcome any comments you may have on this document and supporting background papers. Views submitted will be considered and a final draft will be published in 2017 when another period of consultation will be held.

For further information on the consultation, to view and download the following documents please visit www.greatermanchester-ca.gov.uk/GMSF:

Paper copies of the draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework may be viewed at:

Local libraries in Oldham and at the Oldham Civic Centre Planning Reception,  West Street, Oldham, OL1 IUG (for Sat Navs use OL1 1NL).

A paper copy of the Integrated Assessment may be viewed at:

Civic Centre Planning Reception, West Street, Oldham, OL1 IUG (for Sat Navs use OL1 1NL).

Comments may only be made:

PO Box 532
Town Hall
Manchester
M60 2LA

All comments must be received by 5pm on 23 December 2016.

Please note all comments will be held by the Greater Manchester Combined Authority and will be available to view publicly. Comments cannot be treated as confidential. Your personal information, such as your postal and email address will not be published, but your name and organisation (if relevant) will.

The Greater Manchester Combined Authority maintains a database of consultees who wish to be kept informed about the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework. In responding to this consultation your contact details will automatically be added to the consultation database. If you do not want to be contacted about future Greater Manchester Spatial Framework consultations please state this in your response.

A series of events are being hosted across Greater Manchester which the public are invited to attend and discuss the draft Greater Manchester Spatial Framework.

Drop-in sessions currently arranged are:-

  • 8 November – Performance Space, Oldham Library, Union Street, Oldham – 12noon till 8pm
  • 14 November – Shaw Lifelong Learning Centre, Shaw – 5pm till 6.30pm
  • 21 November – Uppermill Civic Hall, Uppermill – 4.30pm till 6.30pm
  • 24 November – Failsworth Town Hall, Failsworth – 5.00pm till 6.30pm
  • 28 November – Royton Library, Royton – 3pm till 7pm
  •  5 December –  Chadderton Wellbeing Centre, Chadderton – 4.00pm till 6.00pm

Please note: The drop-in sessions will provide an opportunity for members of the public to find out more about the GMSF and meet with Council officers on a one to one level or in small groups.

Additional events may be arranged and details will be published on the Council’s website.

http://www.oldham.gov.uk/info/200711/greater_manchester_plans/1399/greater_manchester_spatial_framework

Marks and Spencer withdrawal a disappointment, says Liberal Democrat Leader

imagesThe Leader of the Liberal Democrat Opposition Group on Oldham Council, Councillor Howard Sykes MBE, has expressed his bitter disappointment on hearing today’s news that Marks and Spencer has pulled out of Oldham’s Princes Gate Development.

Commenting he said: “Following on from the euphoria generated by the recent opening of our new town hall cinema complex this news is of course disappointing but it is also unsurprising given the recent poor financial results and store closures announced by Marks and Spencer.”

“We must all hope that at some point in the future Marks and Spencer will be able to take up retail space in our town, but for now the Council’s focus must be on securing a new prime tenant for the Prince’s Gate site, and soon, if this is to remain a ‘game changing’ development for our Borough.”

“If this is not done quickly the Council will have just created an empty development site that will be an eyesore on one of the main gateways into Oldham’s Town Centre.”