Oldham Liberal Democrat Leader councillor Howard Sykes MBE has hit out at council bosses after it emerged that Oldham Council currently has no plan in place for ‘on street’ residential electric vehicle charging.
Councillor Sykes said, “Demand for electric vehicles is on the rise, with record numbers hitting our roads in 2022. Yet Oldham’s leaders have consistently failed to plan for the future. We are already falling behind other parts of Greater Manchester and the rest of the country.”
A council response to a Freedom of Information request (FOI) seen by Oldham Liberal Democrats confirms that there are currently no plans for an ‘on street residential charging strategy’.
Councillor Sykes said, “Parts of our borough are very densely populated. As demand for electric vehicles grows, we need a strategy that delivers for people living on terraced streets and other high-density housing areas were people do not have drives or garages for home charging. But the council continually misses opportunities to deliver.”
“There is a lack of long-term thinking. Whether that is by failing to factor charging points into development plans like we’ve seen over the years with Uppermill Leisure Centre or the Saddleworth Museum; or whether it is by completely failing to develop a strategy for residential charging. Time is running out for the council to get this right.”
The FOI response also stated that Oldham had 102 ‘publicly available’ charging points as of March 2023.
How many public charging outlets or chargepoints for electric or plug-in hybrid vehicles have you installed to date in your local authority? Please provide figures to the nearest possible date and include the month and the year the figures correspond to.
108 (102 publicly available) – March 2023
For Question 1, how many of the public charging outlets or chargepoints are those classed as On-Street Residential Chargepoints, located on-street in residential streets or areas?
Of the 102 publicly available chargepoints across Oldham, most are located in Council-owned car parks, retail outlets e.g., supermarkets, retail parks and outlets, fast food outlets etc.
How many public charging outlets or chargepoints for electric or plug-in hybrid vehicles do you plan to install in the current fiscal year or the current calendar year? Please provide figures to whichever timeframe corresponds with your reporting.
We plan to install 250 charge points (500 sockets) across the next two financial years (by March 2025) overall.
For Question 3, how many of the planned public charging outlets or charge points are classed as On-Street Residential Chargepoints, to be installed in on-street residential areas?
We can’t say at this stage. Using grant funding (if secured) we would look to install primarily standard chargers at publicly accessible locations, which would be supplemented by faster chargers through a commercial agreement.
Do you have a published strategy for On-Street Residential charging infrastructure?
No
Do you have a dedicated Policy Officer (or equivalent) responsible for your electric vehicle charging infrastructure?
No
Has your local authority submitted an application or multiple applications for the On-Street Residential Chargepoint Scheme (ORCS)?
No
If yes to Question7, how much funding has the local authority applied for in total? The figures can include funding yet to be received.
TfGM have announced a funding pot for small businesses/community groups/education providers. Deadline to apply is 21st July.
The £535k Active Travel grants programme, funded through the DfT and Active Travel England Capability and Ambition Fund, which will support the principals and aims of GM’s refreshed active travel mission.
This grant programme will help local businesses and organisations achieve a culture-shift on operational and business travel and logistics to reduce lorry and van travel in urban areas, to expand and diversify the range and availability of cycles available to the community to increase the opportunity for older and disabled people to cycle and provide opportunities for communities to implement solutions that address specific needs within their local area.
Grants are available to the following audiences within Greater Manchester:
Small businesses, including sole traders and co-ops
VCS or community organisations, including:
voluntary or community groups and organisations
not-for-profit companies
community interest companies (CIC) or other social enterprises
registered charities
Education providers, including:
primary and Secondary schools
further and higher education providers
NHS Healthcare providers, including:
NHS Trusts
GP Practices
They have funding available for three measures:
Cargo cycle solutions – Grants up to £10,000
Adaptive cycle solutions – Grants up to £10,000
Community cycling, walking and wheeling projects – Grants up to £2,500
Applicants can bid for one or more of the measures offered. This can be either up to the maximum grant for an individual measure, or up to a combined total of £15,000.
The application window will close on Friday 21st July.
Further details can be found on the Bee Active website on the link below, where the full guidance documentation and application form can also be downloaded.
Briefing Note: Peter Richards, Head of Planning, Oldham Council
Many will already be aware of proposals by communications operators to install new infrastructure in Oldham that have emerged in recent months. In particular, one operator (IX Wireless) is proposing to roll-out a whole new set of infrastructure across much of the urban area of Oldham to support their Wireless Broadband service, and this has gained a great deal of attention from residents directly affected by the location of new infrastructure near to their homes. However, IX Wireless are not the only operator seeking to install new infrastructure.
I emailed all councillors on 22 March 2023 with an initial update on IX Wireless’ proposals and how we as a Council has to consider those proposals – see link below.
This briefing note necessarily focuses on IX Wireless’ proposals (as their proposals are extensive and attracting the most attention with residents) but please note that the technical planning, highways and communications guidance in this note applies to other operators as well.
What is Electronic Communications Infrastructure?
Electronic communications services (such as landlines, mobile phones and internet services) are now regarded as essential services. In order that these services can be provided where they are needed, The Electronic Communications Code (‘Code’) provides a statutory basis whereby communications providers (known in this context as ‘Operators’) can place their Apparatus on land or buildings owned by another person or organisation.
In view of the ever increasing and critical needs of local communities (and the UK economy as a whole) to have access to 21st century communications networks, such as high speed broadband connection or a 4G mobile connection (and 5G in due course), the Code has been reformed under the Digital Economy Act 2017 so as to make it more straightforward for Operators to gain access to the locations they need, to improve coverage, capability and capacity.
(paragraphs 1.1 and 1.2 of Ofcom’s Electronic Communications Code – Code of Practice, December 2017[1])
An Operator is an organisation which has been granted Code Powers by Ofcom, for example, a communications provider that is providing a landline, broadband, cable or mobile network, or a person who provides infrastructure which supports such a network. A list of those with Code Powers is maintained by Ofcom.
Electronic communications apparatus includes such items as antenna for mobile signals, masts, cabinets, cables, ducts and telegraph poles, and together they create the infrastructure which allows the technology to operate and provide a service to customers (residents and businesses). Apparatus such as the above is clearly already in place across Oldham, but the Electronic Communications Code (the Code) enables Operators to install additional apparatus, where needed, more easily to secure the improvements to electronic communications networks that are required.
Operators are required under the Code to consider if they can utilise existing apparatus where possible and reasonable to do so to provide their service, but there can be technical and practical reasons why an Operator might need to install their own, new apparatus, including to provide better and faster broadband services as demand for this continues to grow.
Another useful set of guidance to be aware of in relation to this is the Code of Practice for Wireless Network Development in England[2], most recently updated by the Department for Digital, Culture, Media & Sport in March 2022.
What are IX Wireless’ proposals?
IX Wireless are looking to roll-out a particular form of “wireless” broadband across Greater Manchester (having already done so in parts of Lancashire, including Blackburn and Blackpool) that will enable 6G connectivity and does not involve fibre to the premises as it relies on antenna and receivers.
At our request, IX Wireless have prepared a pack of information for Oldham councillors to explain more on what their proposals are, how their infrastructure works and what services they are looking to provide to Oldham. I attach that information to this briefing note at Annex 1, as it explains their approach better than I am able to.
In terms of the locations where IX Wireless are proposing to roll-out their infrastructure and services, the plans in the attached pack are indicative, but their proposals involve most of the urban area of the borough, from Failsworth in the south to Shaw in the north, and from Chadderton in the west to Springhead in the east. IX Wireless have notified us of the extent of the infrastructure network they propose to create, but the council is not able to share the detailed location of the apparatus and wider infrastructure network, as it must remain confidential for commercial and security reasons.
The vast majority of the apparatus involves telegraph poles (usually timber poles of 8-10m in height, though they can be larger and sometimes made of metal) and cables connecting from pole to pole. IX Wireless are proposing approximately 860 new telegraph poles across the borough. However, the particular form of wireless broadband service provision that IX Wireless provide also involves what they call a monopole or street pole, which is a larger metal pole (usually around 15m in height) that is capable of holding an antenna and usually has a cabinet at its base and is connected to nearby telegraph poles with cables. There will be far fewer of these monopoles (49), but they are potentially much more visually intrusive than a telegraph pole, depending on the location.
IX Wireless have also written to residents affected in the areas where they are rolling-out their infrastructure first. This initial roll-out is focused more on the telegraph poles. Their letters are addressed to “The Occupier” so there is a concern some residents may have overlooked these letters without opening them or reading them properly.
Is this happening just in Oldham?
IX Wireless are gradually rolling out their infrastructure across Greater Manchester, having already done so in parts of Lancashire. The Greater Manchester authorities and GMCA are liaising with one another and with operators (including IX Wireless). Officers from all the authorities have met jointly with IX Wireless to encourage them to communicate more effectively and to try and establish a consistency in approach across Greater Manchester in how we engage with them.
How does the Council get involved in, or influence, these proposals?
There are three main areas of legislation that the council need to have regard to in how they consider proposals for new communications infrastructure:
Planning,
Highways, and
the Electronic Communications Code.
However, it must be stressed that the council actually has very little influence or control in all of these areas when it comes to proposals for communications infrastructure. As such, when responding to queries from residents about such proposals, it is important that councillors try to manage residents’ expectations of what the council can influence in the proposals and explain how limited the council is when it comes to such proposals.
Taking the three main areas in turn:
Planning
Virtually all of the new apparatus that a company like IX Wireless is looking to install falls under permitted development rights under the General Permitted Development Order (GPDO)[3] – nationally-set rights that allow certain forms of development in certain circumstances to be developed without needing to apply for planning permission. Operators know this, and they design and locate their apparatus to ensure it falls within these permitted development rights. There are typically two types of permitted development of relevance to communications apparatus.
For apparatus such as telegraph poles and their cables, the council as local planning authority has no control at all, and the operators can simply go ahead and install the infrastructure as long as they comply with the requirements set out for this type of permitted development in the GPDO.
For apparatus such as the larger monopoles and street poles, the council has advised IX Wireless (and other operators) that these constitute a “mast” under the GPDO, because they are specifically designed to accommodate an antenna. A “mast” is treated a little differently under the GPDO and requires an operator to seek what is known as “prior approval” for the mast.
Prior Approval is not a planning application, because the proposal is still permitted development, but the operator must submit their plans to the council as local planning authority for consideration before they can implement their plans. However, we can only consider the matters of “siting” and “visual appearance” in the context of the location, and so we can only really influence the proposals to ensure that the apparatus is located in a way that minimises the visual intrusion as much as possible. We cannot refuse the prior approval on grounds of the principle of the development or the need for the apparatus, as this has already been established as acceptable in principle under national planning legislation.
As IX Wireless prepare their plans for these larger monopoles and street poles, they are providing officers (in planning and highways) opportunity to feedback on their suggestions, allowing us to positively influence the location and siting of these poles before they submit for prior approval, and so minimise the impact as best we can. IX Wireless do not have to do this, so are working positively with officers in this way.
When the council do receive a prior approval application, we as local planning authority will notify the local community through a site notice displayed close to the site of the proposed mast and / or a letter to those properties directly adjacent to the site. The plans go on our website as well. Interested parties can submit comments on the plans for us to consider, but we can only take account of comments related to the matters of siting and visual appearance.
Given the above, under planning legislation, there is very little the council can do to influence or control the proposals of communications operators, but officers are working with IX Wireless to influence the proposals positively where we can.
Highways
Much of the apparatus that an operator might want to install needs to be located on adopted highway, usually within a pavement or a highway verge. As a result, an operator must apply to the council as highways authority for a permit to undertake works on the adopted highway. This process is merely to ensure that the actual works are to be done in a safe manner and will not affect highway or pedestrian safety, and that the surface of the adopted highway will be reinstated once the works are complete. The permit application is not an opportunity for the council to raise concerns about the principle of needing the apparatus or to question the suitability of the broad location for the apparatus.
As such, under highway legislation, there is also very little the council can do to influence or control the proposals of communications operators, except to ensure that the works they do undertake are done safely and to a suitable standard so as to ensure the adopted highway is still safe and functional.
The Electronic Communications Code
The Electronic Communications Code is found in Schedule 3A to the Communications Act 2003 and is supported by the Electronic Communications Code (Conditions and Restrictions) Regulations 2003. The Code is a set of rights that are designed to facilitate the installation and maintenance of electronic communications networks.
The Code confers rights on providers of such networks and on providers of systems of infrastructure (i.e., operators) to install and maintain apparatus on, under and over land and results in considerably simplified planning procedures. Ofcom are responsible for enforcing this legislation with operators. Ofcom’s website[4] provides some useful information in relation to the Code.
The Minister for Science, Innovation & Technology recently wrote to local planning authorities reminding them of the role that Ofcom play in enforcing the Code and encouraging local planning authorities to report any evidence of operators not complying with the Code (see letter included at Annex 2). However, to report an operator to Ofcom in this way, the council would need site-specific evidence to support any report of non-compliance and this can be difficult to evidence given how flexibly the Code and its Regulations can be interpreted.
The Regulations cover various matters which residents and councillors have raised with me in relation to IX Wireless’ proposals. The following table provides a quick summary of some of the main queries and what the regulations say about them.
Query
What the Regulations say
Comments
Why are IX Wireless installing new poles and cables – shouldn’t they share existing apparatus already in place?
Regulation 3, para 4 states: “A code operator, where practicable, shall share the use of electronic communications apparatus.” Regulation 3, para 5 states: “A code operator shall install the minimum practicable number of items of electronic communications apparatus consistent with the intended provision of electronic communications services and allowing for an estimate of growth in demand for such services.”
The key phrase in regulation 3(4) here is “where practicable”. The regulation provides for the option of not sharing apparatus, if it is not practicable. Regulation 3(5) goes on to clarify that installing new apparatus should be kept to the minimum needed to provide the intended services and accounting for the growth in demand. Therefore, taking these two paragraphs together, the regulations do allow the provision of new infrastructure where it is not practicable to share, where it is needed to provide the intended services and to meet growing demand for those services.
Why can’t IX Wireless put their cables under the ground?
Regulation 4, para 1 states: “A code operator shall install all lines underground unless— (a) the line is flown from a pole in an area where service lines are already flown from poles; … (e) it is not in all the circumstances reasonably practicable to do so.”
Regulation 4 allows new lines of cable to flown from a pole in an area where this already happens, and this would cover many of the streets IX Wireless are proposing to install new poles and lines on. Even where this isn’t the case, if it is not practicable to put cable lines underground, the operator does not have to, according to Regulation 4(1)(e). Installing cables under the ground costs a great deal more, and so it would become a financial decision as to whether it is practicable to install cable lines underground, as the added cost may make the business model unsustainable for an operator.
Have IX Wireless notified the council of their intention to install new apparatus? If they have, why have the council not notified local residents and sought their input on the proposals?
Regulation 5, para 1 states: “A code operator must give one calendar month’s notice, in writing, to the planning authority for the area in question …”
IX Wireless have met this regulation, given that they notified us well in advance of their overall planned programme. This notification is not part of planning legislation, and it is just to notify the council as local planning authority where the operator intends to install apparatus under permitted development rights. As such, it is not an application, and the council cannot “refuse” permission for it, therefore there is no legal framework that allows us to in turn notify local residents or seek their input into the proposals, as the council are not making a decision to permit or refuse the proposals.
Have the Council provided any conditions that IX Wireless must adhere to when installing their apparatus?
Regulation 5, para 3 states: “Where a code operator has given notice under paragraph (1), the planning authority may, within one calendar month of the receipt of that notice, give the code operator written notice of conditions with which the planning authority wishes him to comply in respect of the installation of the apparatus, but he is not obliged to comply with those conditions to the extent that they are unreasonable in all the circumstances.”
The council can provide conditions to operators in the way described by regulation 5(3), but these must relate to “the installation of apparatus” – i.e., to how they install the apparatus, not where the apparatus is located or its visual appearance. As such, the council utilises the highway permit application process to guide the “how” of the installation, rather than providing a generic set of conditions across the entire proposed network when more specific requirements may be necessary on a site-by-site basis.
Summary
Hopefully this briefing note has provided a helpful overview to you of the background to electronic communications infrastructure and provided more specific detail on IX Wireless’ proposals across the borough, that will aid you as you field queries from your constituents.
Ultimately, the council is very limited in what it can influence on such proposals, particularly in relation to planning legislation, and whilst the Electronic Communications Code does set some expectations for how operators should consider installing new apparatus, it is Ofcom who enforce that Code and we would require site-specific evidence that an operator has not complied with the regulations governing the Code in order to report them to Ofcom. At this time, we have seen no such evidence of how IX Wireless have not complied with the Code.
Liberal Democrats challenge council bosses on school absences as teachers warn of “ghost-children”
Leader of Oldham Liberal Democrats, councillor Howard Sykes MBE has challenged Oldham Council to provide answers on school absences across the Borough after education leaders warned of rising rates of absent children in classrooms across the country.
Upon submitting a Freedom of Information request calling for Oldham-specific absence data, councillor Sykes said, “Children of all ages have had their education hugely impacted by the covid-19 pandemic and the lockdowns. Teachers have struggled to ensure that children are able to catch up. These rates of absence in our schools should worry us all. The Council must urgently provide figures for school absences in Oldham and provide support, where it is needed, to get children back into school.”
This intervention from Councillor Sykes comes after it was revealed that more than one in five children were recorded as ‘persistently absent’ in 2022 – meaning that they missed 19 or more school days in a year.
Last month (May) former Children’s Commissioner Anne Longfield wrote to the government to raise the alarm about the spiralling number of absences, including those of ‘severely absent’ children, who have missed at least half of the time they should be in school.
Councillor Sykes said, “We must not allow children in Oldham to fall behind. The council has a role to play in making sure parents and teachers have the help they need to keep children learning in the classroom.”
FOI Request submitted by councillor Sykes
Subject: Request information relating to school absences – both persistent and severe
FAO: Oldham Borough Council
This is a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
I am writing to request information relating to school absences – both persistent and severe – in Oldham borough.
Please can you provide information outlining the number of children who have been persistently absent in the years 2019/20, 2020/21, 2021/22 and 2022/23.
Please can you also provide information outlining the number of children who have been severely absent in the years 2019/20, 2020/21, 2021/22 and 2022/23.
Oldham Liberal Democrat Leader and Shaw representative councillor Howard Sykes MBE has welcomed new laws that could protect free access to cash for all.
Councillor Sykes said, “Free access to cash is vitally important, not just for individuals but also for the businesses on our high streets. Increasingly, we make more and more cashless transactions. But we can’t let cash machines disappear from our streets because people should have the right to access their money with ease, it can be a real lifeline in some cases.”
Last year, consumer researchers at ‘Which?’ revealed that almost half of the UK’s bank branches had closed since 2015. In addition, a further 12,178 free-to-use cash machines had also vanished since 2018. But new laws announced by the government this year under the Financial Services and Markets Bill will now offer real protections to cash machines whilst also guaranteeing that people can withdraw and deposit their cash for free.
Councillor Sykes said, “I fully welcome and support this aspect of the Government’s Bill. Liberal Democrats have long campaigned for free and fair access to cash. We have already lost several cash machines in Shaw and Crompton. We really need to guard against this loss in our community and in the country more widely.”
The Financial Services and Markets Bill is currently passing through the House of Lords and is expected to pass into UK law later this year.
Oldham Liberal Democrats call on council bosses to get tough on contractors for Fair Tax Week 2023
Liberal Democrat councillors in Oldham are marking Fair Tax Week 2023 (8th – 18th June – inc Tax Justice Sunday 11 June) by calling on Council Chiefs to “get tough” on partners and contractors.
Leader of Oldham Liberal Democrats, councillor Sykes MBE said, “Oldham Council passed a Fair Tax Declaration in 2019. But four years on, the Council still can’t give a clear answer on whether its contractors are abiding by the fair tax practices we have pledged to support.”
Councillor Sykes has written an open letter to the council’s Chief Executive, Harry Catherall and Council Leader councillor Arooj Shah calling on the Council’s leadership to provide a progress report, four years on.
In his letter, councillor Sykes calls on Oldham Council to “lead by example” on fair tax policies.
Councillor Sykes said, “Fair Tax Week 2023 is an opportunity for Oldham Council to reaffirm its commitment and lead by example. Liberal Democrats are proud to have put ‘Fair Tax’ on the Council’s agenda four years ago and we are continuing to ensure that Oldham’s leaders live up to the commitments they made in the Council chamber. We can do this by ensuring that the contractors we employ properly adhere to fair tax practices.”
You will be aware that, in July 2019, Oldham Council adopted the Fair Tax Declaration. Oldham Council is listed alongside other local authorities and organisations that have also signed up to ‘Fair Tax’ principles and practices.
With ‘Fair Tax Week’ 2023 fast approaching, businesses and councils across the country will soon declare support for the invaluable contribution that fair taxes make to the economy. This is an opportunity for Oldham Council to re-affirm its commitment and lead by example.
The motion passed by Full Council on 10/07/2019 committed the council to ensuring that Oldham’s contractors implement IR35 legislation robustly. It is essential that Oldham lives up to the commitments we make in the council chamber.
I am writing to request that the leadership of Oldham Council provide a progress update on the implementation of Fair Tax policy pledges – as outlined in the July 2019 motion – particularly regarding our dealings with contractors and other partners.
We have been informed that the Lilac View Close, Clough, Shaw, Planning Application will be heard at the Shaw and Crompton Parish Council Planning Committee on the 13th June 2023 at 6.00pm.
It is important to note that the Parish Council are only a statutory consultee in the overall planning process however, the committee’s recommendations will form part of the final report to be presented to Oldham Council’s Planning Committee at a date in the future.
The planning application number is FUL/350791/23 and can be viewed online at www.oldham.gov.uk and navigate to the Planning Portal where the full application can be viewed. Online comments with regards to this application have now closed, but residents are still able to comment by emailing or writing to the planning department quoting the above reference number.
Members of the public attending the meeting can comment, speak in support or objection of an application during the ‘Open Forum’ segment of the meeting, but not during the councils’ deliberations later. However, they may be asked to provide clarity on details of the application during the Parish Council deliberations, at the invitation of the person Chairing the meeting.
The meeting will commence at 6pm on Tuesday 13 June at:
The Parish Council Offices, 1 Kershaw Street East, Shaw, Oldham OL2 8AB.
If you require any clarification of details or specific access requirements, please contact the Clerk to the Council on 01706 847590
