The Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group, Councillor Howard Sykes MBE, has responded to a consultation with Councillors on the proposed new Housing Strategy for the Borough by asking for more affordable, accessible and environmentally friendly homes to be built.
Councillor Sykes said: “More affordable homes are needed, including more homes for social-rent and for part-ownership, especially for first-time buyers and renters on a lower income who need a helping hand to get on the housing ladder. With our growing population, we will also need more accessible properties catering for the needs of older people with disabilities, for families with one or more children with disabilities and for young adults with disabilities wishing to live independently.”
“Finally, we are all becoming increasingly aware of the need to reduce our carbon footprint to help save Mother Earth. The Oldham Liberal Democrats would like to see more eco-homes with excellent thermal insulation and the means to produce electricity and heat from renewable sources, and, with the drive towards electric vehicles, with a charging point as standard.”
For the Liberal Democrats, a given is that housing development should not be on the greenbelt. Councillor Sykes added: “We are totally opposed to any house building on our precious green belt when there are existing brownfield sites that can be built upon first, including cleared sites with planning permission and derelict mills and empty shops in our town centres that can be converted. These locations are often eyesores and local people would often welcome them being brought back into productive use. The greenbelt is irreplaceable and once lost will be lost forever – that is why so many residents in this borough are up in arms about Labour’s proposals in the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework.”
Copy letter below:
Tim English, PFI Principal Project Manager, Housing Strategy, Oldham Council
Dear Mr English,
The Oldham Liberal Democrat Group would like to make the following suggestions for consideration as part of the next housing strategy.
- Be a focus on affordable housing:
A high priority should be placed upon ensuring that our affordable housing strategy is, in light of the recent comments, robust and ‘fit for purpose’
We should explore new ways of providing homes in partnership with local providers, including by investigating:
- The option of setting up a Housing Development Company
- Making use of reforms in the use of the Housing Revenue Account and prudential borrowing powers to finance house building by the new company
- Accessing finance via the new LG Develop scheme recently established by the Local Government Association
- Identifying, with partners (such as housing associations, the NHS, local developers and landowners), local land sites that have potential for housing development through the new company
- Be a focus on accessible housing.
For many people living with disabilities and of working age there are few housing options available to them.
Homes in the private sector frequently lack the amenities and equipment necessary for occupation and utility by someone who is disabled, and there is currently no requirement for such housing providers to market properties so equipped to suitable applicants.
The Accessible Housing Project, managed by the Oldham Housing Investment Partnership, in 2011 – 12 catalogued approximately 4,000 homes in the social rented sector (around 20% of the stock) that were ‘accessible’, providing ground-floor and / or specially adapted accommodation. However for working age tenants as many of these were located within age restricted or grouped schemes, it is seldom attractive to younger disabled applicants who wish to access employment, value their independence and who desire to live amongst their peers.
Reports on the national situation (such as the 2012 Trailblazers report ‘Locked Out’ produced by a group of young disabled adults) identified the problems that disabled people of working age encounter in finding suitable ‘accessible’ accommodation in the private rented and for-sale sectors, frustrating their aspirations for independent living, social mobility, to make a career or start a family.
In addition, the Accessible Housing Project identified a continued need for
- Larger houses (particularly 4-bedrooms) for families with a child or children with complex disability needs.
- Short-term respite accommodation to enable hospital discharges and rehabilitation, whilst the individual’s current home is adapted in readiness for resettlement or re-housing.
- Bespoke accommodation for clients with complex needs currently living in supported accommodation and seeking independent living, but still requiring significant 24-hour care and support.
Indications at the time were that there would be an increasing disconnect between need and supply if corrective action were not taken to build such specialist homes in Oldham.
I know some good work has come about in recent years, and we need to revisit this to ensure we are following (and establishing) current best practice.
- Be a focus on sustainable housing
Built in harmony with the environment with (wherever practical and affordable) a minimal carbon footprint, highly insulated and with self-generating renewable energy sources.
The Liberal Democrats strongly believe that new housing should be built on existing brown field sites, those sites that already have planning permission, or created through the conversion of mills, shops, industrial premises and offices where these are no longer required for their original purpose.
We also believe that housing should be co-located with places of employment, health care, education, worship, recreation and shopping to create holistic communities that provide for the needs of their residents, and that they should be well-served by public transport. This will reduce the need for car journeys and so reduce the carbon footprint.
In addition, as there will in future be a drive towards electric cars replacing petrol-driven vehicles it is our belief that planning consents should in future require developers to provide an electric vehicle charging point for each house or where these comprise flatted or grouped schemes a number of shared charging points. Furthermore consideration needs to be given, in circumstances where the development is aimed at disabled residents, for the safe storage and charging of electric wheelchairs and scooters.
I thank you for your consideration of these points and I would welcome a response from you on them in due course to relay to members of my group.
Yours sincerely, Howard Sykes
CC Councillor Hannah Roberts, Cabinet Member for Housing
The Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group, Councillor Howard Sykes MBE, has asked Oldham’s Council Leader to bid for new Government money that is intended to revitalise Britain’s high streets. Councillor Sykes also wants the Leader to invite the Communities Minister James Brokenshire MP to the Borough to showcase some of the excellent work that is being done by Oldham’s voluntary sector.
Councillor Sykes explained: “We all want to see a thriving and vibrant town centre economy and equally thriving district centres, in places such as Chadderton, Failsworth, Lees, Royton, Shaw, and Uppermill, but sadly in recent years our retail and leisure economy has been in decline, threatened by out-of-town shopping centres and the growth in online retailing.”
“Last year, I was therefore pleased to hear the Government announcing the launch of a new £675 million Future High Streets Fund. For once, this was positive news as the fund is intended to improve transport links and amenities in our town and district centres and to bring empty spaces back into use as homes, offices or community hubs. In December, the Government invited local Councils to bid for money from the fund before the 22 March 2019. I believe we should do so. At a time when Government funding for local authorities has been cut to a record low – and it will get even worse in the future – this pot of money is most welcome.”
Councillor Sykes has written to the Council Leader urging him to make an application and ensure that the needs of district centres, such as Shaw, are included in the proposal. Councillor Sykes sees another benefit from a successful bid:
“As the fund has the potential to convert under-used town and district centre spaces into homes, it has the potential to provide finance for new accommodation on brownfield sites and so reduce the pressure on greenbelt sites currently allocated for housing under the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework.”
Councillor Sykes has also suggested that the Communities Secretary James Brokenshire MP be invited to Oldham to see first-hand some of the excellent work being done by the borough’s voluntary sector in providing for the needs of the communities they serve, most especially in the provision of welfare services to disadvantaged and vulnerable groups.
The letter is below:
31 January 2019
Councillor Sean Fielding, Leader and Cabinet Member for Economy and Enterprise, Oldham Council
Dear Councillor Fielding,
I am sure that like me you wish to see a thriving, vibrant retail and leisure economy in our town centre and in each of our district centres. I am writing to you to urge this Administration to apply to join several new initiatives from the current UK Government, that for once are welcome as they are intended to revitalise our high streets.
Last month, the Government published a call for proposals for funding from the £675 million Future High Streets Fund, launched last year by Communities Secretary James Brokenshire MP. The fund will support transport and infrastructure improvements and turn under-used retail spaces into homes, offices and community hubs.
The document issued by the Government sets out how the Fund will operate, with expressions of interest from councils requested by 22 March 2019 (links inserted below refer).
As the fund has the potential to convert under-used town and district centre spaces into homes, it has the potential to provide finance for new accommodation on brownfield sites and as such reduce the pressure on greenbelt sites currently allocated for housing under the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework.
Mr Brokenshire also recently announced a new Open Doors project to reduce loneliness and increase visits to high streets by linking landlords of empty premises with local groups. This can offer services to younger and older people through the creation of intergenerational projects and pop-up galleries. The first phase inviting the participation of landlords has now closed, and I am unaware if there were any applications submitted from Oldham. There will however be a second phase involving community groups for which we should apply.
There will be a Communities Roadshow where the Minister and his team will be visiting projects around the country to learn from schemes where local people are leading the way to improve their communities and finally the Government will work with the Prince of Wales’s charity Business in the Community, to support firms offering employees volunteering opportunities.
I would like to ask you how this Administration will be responding to these initiatives, specifically relating to the questions inserted below:
- Will we be submitting a proposal for consideration for the Future High Streets Fund?
- Will the submission confirm that the needs of our district centres, such as Shaw and Uppermill, will be considered as part of a bid?
- May I suggest that we invite the Ministerial Community Roadshow to visit our Borough?
As always happy to discuss and do hope we can take advantage of this fund.
Best wishes, Howard Sykes
In their budget proposals for the coming financial year (2019/20), the Liberal Democrat Group on Oldham Council have found more than £2 million more to invest in front-line services over the next three years largely by identifying more ways to save money at the Civic Centre.
This money would be used to pay for a further £5 million investment in the Borough’s highways, including a £1 million fund dedicated to restoring pedestrian footways; create a new Environmental Task Force to respond quickly and effectively to instances of fly-tipping, dog-fouling and littering; and pay to build a new health centre for patients in Shaw and Crompton.
The Liberal Democrats also want to reverse Labour’s proposals to cut the local budgets of Ward Councillors and Parish Councils to keep more money available locally to tackle the priorities of residents in the districts.
The Liberal Democrat proposals will be considered by the Council’s Overview and Scrutiny Performance and Value for Money Committee (PVFM) on Tuesday 5 February.
The Deputy Leader of the Opposition and of the Liberal Democrat Group, Councillor Chris Gloster, who is Shadow Cabinet Member for Finance said: “Our amendment to the Administration budget reflects the concerns that members of the public have expressed to Liberal Democrat Councillors for better highways and safer footways; action to deal with the anti-social nuisance such as fly-tipping, dog fouling and littering that blights our local communities; and more money directed through Ward Councillors and Parish Councils to meet the priorities of local communities.”
“It is good that the Labour Administration has finally decided to adopt a previous Liberal Democrat budget proposal to fund an extra £18 million in highway improvements, but we have once more gone one better and found the means to finance £5 million more spending, and to earmark a £1 million budget to also improve our footpaths. It is good too that Labour decided recently to follow a past Liberal Democrat proposal to invest more in additional street-cleaners, but again we have done one better in finding money for a new responsive Environmental Task Force.”
He added: “I am especially pleased that in our budget proposals we have also found money to build a new replacement health centre for the people of Shaw and Crompton; this is long-overdue. Liberal Democrat Ward Councillors have been calling for a new health centre for many years. The present building is falling apart at the seams, and increasingly unfit-for-purpose. It is inadequate to meet the current health-care needs of our constituents, let alone those of the thousands of new residents that we will see if the Labour Council approves the thousands of new homes that the Greater Manchester Spatial Framework threatens Shaw and Crompton with. Royton and Werneth have bespoke all-singing, all-dancing health centres, and it is about time Shaw and Crompton did too.”
The Liberal Democrat Deputy Leader fully acknowledges that Conservative government funding cuts have made balancing the Council’s budget an increasingly difficult proposition so the party’s spending plans have been financed by extra saving cuts and revenue-raising in ways that do not increase the Council Tax.
In response, Councillor Gloster said: “I do not envy the lead Cabinet Member for or our officers in the Treasury team their task. Government funding shortfalls mean that once more £22.7 million in savings must be found from the Council’s budget in the next financial year. Current estimates are that in subsequent years the budget will need to be trimmed by £22.883m for 2020/21, £10.889m for 2021/22, £6.859m for 2022/23 and £4.160m for 2023/24. So the Liberal Democrats will, with great regret, support Labour’s proposal to increase Council Tax bills by 3.99% to help balance the books, but, because we know many of our residents are hurting financially, we will not add to their burden with our plans.”
Once again the Liberal Democrat Group has found the money to pay for their extra investments through taking a scythe to back-office administration and bureaucracy.
This year’s ‘War on Waste’ has yielded over £1 million in additional savings without having a negative impact on front-line services.
Councillor Gloster explained some of the additional reductions the Liberal Democrats are proposing: “Many of our proposals have been consistent in recent years, but this year we have discovered one or two new sources of waste. Our cuts focus on several core areas – better workforce management practices, a reduction in the number of councillors and reduction in expenditure on communications.”
“We believe that Labour is not being ambitious enough in its proposals to manage the recruitment and retention of staff, especially agency staff and consultants. We want to place increasingly ambitious targets year-on-year upon managers to manage their workforces more efficiently. This year we estimate this could yield an additional £550,000 in savings. We also want again to look at how sickness is managed in this authority”.
“Lastly we want this Administration to live up to the promise it made to review car allowances and cut lump sum payments to staff using their vehicles very infrequently on Council business. If, as we propose, the automatic entitlement to a £500 payment is withdrawn from the 100 or so staff who use their vehicles to make journeys amounting to 100 miles per year or less – an average of less than two miles per week – we can realise a saving of at least £50,000 per annum when fully-implemented. We also want the Administration to look again at expenditure on air travel for staff, which seems grossly excessive when compared to that of our neighbours.”
The Liberal Democrats are mindful that it is only fair that Councillors too share the pain with staff. Councillor Gloster explained how: “Once more, we are calling for a reduction in the number of Councillors by 20 (a third) and for a reduction in the number of local elections to two every four years. This is consistent with our proposals in recent years. If approved by the Boundary Commission, these changes would release a £290,000 saving in 2020-21 to spend on front-line services.”
Councillor Howard Sykes, Leader of the Opposition and Leader of the Liberal Democrat Group on Oldham Council along with his Liberal Democrat colleagues also want to revisit expenditure on marketing and communications. He explained: “We would cull all non-statutory spending. There is a requirement to publish certain statutory notices to inform the public and invite comments, but there is no legal requirement to publish ‘propaganda on the rates’ like Borough Life. We want to scrap it and in our view every penny spent on this and another staff conference is another one denied to vulnerable people receiving social care. We want to see a saving of £150,000 on marketing this year and a further £100,000 in each of the next two financial years. Information and messages can now be delivered almost cost free via social media, and printing less is good for our environment.”
Councillor Sykes concluded: “Although the Liberal Democrat proposals are modest when compared to the financial challenge faced by Oldham Council, they do nonetheless achieve real savings that can be put back into front-line services that matter to people, and they are reflective of the Liberal Democrat approach to public finance – to apply common sense, an innovative approach and tough love to cut waste and squeeze the most out of every penny of our finances to deliver the best services that we can for our hard-pressed Council Tax payers.”
“I would like to thank my colleague, the new Deputy Leader and Shadow Cabinet Member for Finance, Councillor Chris Gloster, and the Council officers who have supported him, for their hard-work and commitment in putting this budget amendment together. In the current challenging financial situation it is difficult to create a balanced budget, whether in the Administration or in Opposition, and anyone involved in this process deserves full credit for their efforts.”
A summary of the Liberal Democrat savings and spending proposals and the agenda for PVFM follow the link: Agenda details on public web site
The Planning Inspector has just published his decision (see link below) to grant the above filling station. This is despite representations by local residents, local Councillors, and Oldham Council.
Below is the decision in full:
Despite the application initially being refused by the Oldham Council Planning Committee due to the disturbance this development will cause to residents who live directly opposite, the recommendation by Council Highways Officers of the potentially dangerous effect this development would have on Shaw’s road system, and the loss of recycling facilities which Asda made no provision for, the Inspector has decided to allow the appeal, but has strengthened and enhanced the planning conditions proposed including timing and junction alterations as well as maintaining the provision of a recycling facility.
Having spoken to local residents to inform them of the news, they are bitterly disappointed and believe that this development will undoubtedly affect their quality of life being only some 13 metres away from their homes.
The communities of Shaw and Crompton were always divided on this application, whereas some welcomed the likelihood of cheaper fuel, others recognised the detrimental effect to the neighbours and road system, as well as increased congestion at peak times.
Although Liberal Democrat Shaw Ward councillors are disappointed at the outcome of the appeal, they are pleased that the Inspector has retained and increased the planning conditions imposed upon Asda before the development can begin.